In The Times recently Irish journalist Fintan O’Toole looked
at the question of Scottish independence through Irish eyes. He was reminiscing
about taking a play about the Easter Rising of 1916 on tour to Glasgow in 1991.
He could see that many in the audience were moved to tears and assumed that
they were émigré Irish. It turned out however that they were Scots who somehow
felt jealous of the heroic path taken by Irish nationalism in the 20th
century. However even then in the cold light of day it seemed clear that Scotland
had followed a more profitable path within the union as measured by various
social and economic statistics and the reality that lots of Irish had migrated
to Scotland but few Scots went the other way.
It reminded me of a visit to the museum in Kinsale and
understanding for the first time the plight of the Irish following the battle
of Kinsale and later after the defeat of James II at the Battle of the Boyne.
Ireland was sorely brutalised, much more so than the Highlands of Scotland after
the Jacobite rebellion of 1745-6. The Irish certainly had a stronger case that
the Scots to be rid of their arrogant colonial masters.
Coming to the
present, the Celtic Tiger model that put wind in Alex Salmond’s
sails has bit its own tail as the property bubble burst. Worse still the Irish
are facing a major loss in sovereignty as their budgets are scrutinised in Berlin
and Brussels, the fate of all weak members of the currency union that is the
Euro. The position of an independent Scotland in the Euro or indeed in an
extended currency union in Sterling with England would not be so different.
Total independence would require a return to the Pound Scots, a currency that
has disappeared completely from the debate.
It seems clear that Scotland has to make its own detailed
case for independence, learning from the mistakes of the Irish and others. With
the benefit of a little hindsight, the overwhelming case for the union in the
first place was the opportunity to benefit fully from the Industrial Revolution
and the vast potential of the British Empire. Scots and Scotland benefitted greatly
from both, but that was long in the past. As a relatively small country Scotland
could focus on its strengths and sort out the social problems that are a direct
hangover from the Industrial Revolution.
Independence is no
guarantor of good government, but at least there will be nobody else to blame. Daft
policies are already with us in the current Scottish Government’s plan that the
country could be run 100% on renewable electricity. Not being able to trust
them to keep the lights on is hardly a good start. And inflicting the current
monarchy on us without constitutional consultation is high handed and
patronising. My novel, The Stuart Agenda, is a metaphor for the choice that should be given to the Scottish people. This makes the point that
nationalist politics are completely stunted by having only one nationalist
party. We need other nationalist parties giving us competing visions for Scotland.
The final message to the Scots would be from the only
Irishman in the world who would vote to re-join the union with Britain, if you
could find him.
The Stuart Agenda by Alan Calder, published by Willow Moon. e-book and paperback at all Amazon sites. See http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B005BJ3GNI for reviews.
As to the last point, Alan, I don't believe you will find him. But I do hope your lights stay on and wish the best and brightest future to Scotland.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting and thoughtful post, Alan. Your statement that 'Independence is no guarantor of good government, but at least there will be nobody else to blame' hits the nail on the head. The world is a rapidly changing place, and many are watching Scotland to see what happens. Best to you and your writing.
ReplyDeleteGood point, Alan. I live in the USA...someone is always pointing their finger at someone else here too. And don't get me started on our government.
ReplyDeleteGreat post,
Neecy